- agents
- AI
- ambiguity
- architecture
- augmented reality
- books
- bureaucracy
- career
- change
- Christmas
- cloud
- collaboration
- communication
- compliance
- corporate life
- data
- decisions
- delivery
- devops
- disagreement
- end user tools
- ethics
- failure
- fear
- fundamentals
- government
- halloween
- history
- humans
- hype
- identity
- inclusion
- infrastructure
- innovation
- language
- leadership
- learning
- legacy
- management
- measurement
- mental health
- money
- networking
- New Year
- operations
- philosophy
- physics
- platforms
- prediction
- privacy
- process
- procurement
- products
- programming
- quantum
- reliability
- resilience
- risk
- science fiction
- security
- shadow IT
- space
- strategy
- talent
- teaching
- teams
- technical debt
- technology advocacy
- testing
- thinking
- transformation
- TV
- virtues
- vision
- writing
Generative AI: time to learn a whole new vocabulary
I have no idea how to talk about sport. This was a disadvantage when growing up as a teenager at an all boy’s school. I felt as if I’d missed an important lesson, or failed to read the manual that the other boys had been issued at an early age. How else did everybody else have a vocabulary, a set of concepts, a whole language, that was opaque to me?
I initially felt the same way when attempting to learn in public about generative AI, the set of solutions such as ChatGPT and DALL-E which are receiving a lot of attention right now.
This was the week when I was supposed to read a few more detailed papers, to find a couple of books, and to go deep enough to get to grips with the main concepts. However, I found that, unlike my similar experiment with quantum computing, it was hard to find accessible entry points. Perhaps this is because, despite rapid developments in recent years, the ideas behind quantum computing have been around for a long while - long enough for experts to write introductions for curious laypeople like me. By contrast, most of the material describing generative AI technologies was quite new, and either so high level that it told me little I didn’t already know (and much that I had reason to be sceptical of), or dived so deep that I was as baffled as if listening to the dissection of a football match. No-one has had time to write the accessible introduction yet.
When talking to AI, be careful what you ask for
You’ve got to ask the right questions.
According to Herodotus, when Croesus went to the Oracle at Delphi to ask whether he should go to war, the Oracle replied that, ‘If you make war on the Persians, you shall destroy a great empire’. Encouraged, Croesus launched his war, only to find that he was defeated, and it was his empire that was destroyed.
This lesson seemed particularly important when I was attempting my second week of learning in public about generative AI. As with my exploration of quantum computing, I began this second week by opening my browser, entering some search terms and reading the top few news articles that were returned.
Can we generate intelligence about generative artificial intelligence?
Where’s my talking robot?
Robots and computers capable of holding conversations with human beings have been a staple of science fiction and visions of the future for many decades. Yet, until recently, they have seemed as elusive as flying cars.
And, while we’re asking, when’s the automated programmer arriving?
Since my first ever professionally programming job, the technology industry has threatened to do away with the job of programming - whether through 4GLs, low-code / no-code solutions, or other ways of avoiding the job of building code line by line. However, these approaches have seemed to do no more than push the need for programming somewhere else.