- agents
- AI
- ambiguity
- architecture
- augmented reality
- books
- bureaucracy
- career
- change
- Christmas
- cloud
- collaboration
- communication
- compliance
- corporate life
- data
- decisions
- delivery
- devops
- disagreement
- end user tools
- ethics
- failure
- fear
- fundamentals
- government
- halloween
- history
- humans
- hype
- identity
- inclusion
- infrastructure
- innovation
- language
- leadership
- learning
- legacy
- management
- measurement
- mental health
- money
- networking
- New Year
- operations
- philosophy
- physics
- platforms
- prediction
- privacy
- process
- procurement
- products
- programming
- quantum
- reliability
- resilience
- risk
- science fiction
- security
- shadow IT
- space
- strategy
- talent
- teaching
- teams
- technical debt
- technology advocacy
- testing
- thinking
- transformation
- TV
- virtues
- vision
- writing
The round trip question: a duty to explain
Something has been bothering me: I have been designing, building and running computer systems for over thirty years, and believe that the explosive growth of information technology in that time is a net good for the world. At the same time, I have observed a growing gap in understanding between the people who build and run technology for a living and the people who use it. Information technology touches more people’s lives more deeply every day - yet is increasingly difficult to understand.
I sometimes test this feeling by asking what I call ‘the round trip question’. The question is: when you hit a button on your mobile banking app which tells it to do something (get your balance, make a payment, or some other function), what do you imagine happens? (It doesn’t have to be banking, but it’s the industry I happen to have worked in for longest.)